Homer
(.416 member)
29/08/21 09:07 AM
Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash

G'Day Fella's,

Thanks for sharing Ripp.

As is common/usual in the shooting media, just another X versus Y article.

These shooting "Journalists", are just trying to make a dollar, by shit stirring up speculation, thru comparison.
Sure the 9.3x62 and the .35 Whelen (and the mighty .350 Rem Mag) are almost identical twins but ...... having a case capacity of around 60 grains of powder, and trying to compare it, to a cartridge like the .375 H&H Mag, with around 80 grains capacity, should end all discussions.

As for the rifles that that cartridges require.
Any Rem 700, Long Action, will hold any cartridge from the .25-06, to the .375 H&H (and .416 Rem Mag and I imagine, .416 Rigby).
And, I have never heard these same "journalists", refer to a Rem 700, as Big or Heavy or Uncommon.

As for rpeck's Husqvarna in 9.3x62, Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Donuts!
Project update: I want to build a rifle, on a Brno ZKK-600 action I have, in the same proportions and chambering, as rpeck's Full wood rifle. Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm More Donuts!!

Avagreatweekendeh!
Homer



Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved