| Rule303 |
| (.450 member) |
| 08/02/18 10:03 PM |
Re: Blaser R93 in 416 Remington Rapid Fire
|
Quote:
Sure you can hit things out to 500 meters but I am talking about killing game animals ethically. Accurate heart/lung shots on a Fallow deer for instance is quite difficult with 1 to 1 magnification at 150 to 200 yards, as it is with open sights. Classic rifles often had sights to 500 or even 1000 yards but that doesn't mean that you could accurately hit the vitals of an animal. The stories of hunters in those days is also filled with tales of animals needing many shots to be killed and follow-ups lasting many hours tracking wounded game that were gut shot etc. If they were so good at 200 yards than no one would bother buying a scope with magnification which costs more and is heavier. I hunt a lot with an Aimpoint for deer and find them fantastic but I limit my shots to 150 yards or there abouts. If you feel comfortable that you can take longer shots accurately than by all means go ahead. I must say that I prefer to stalk in as close as possible rather than long shots anyway, but that's just me.
Waidmannsheil.
Hitting the 500mt rams in the chest seems to me it would get the job done. Have seen a few old timers knocking beer cans with the SMLE and open sights at 200yard. Had a peep sight on my M94 in 30-30 dropped a few pigs around the 200 mt mark, none wounded. Now that was in my younger days with excellent eye sight and putting several thousand rounds a year down range or out hunting.
So what I am saying is, if you are capable, then so is the sight. Am I capable now, No. Just do not do enough shooting to be that proficient.