|
|
|||||||
Quote: And respectfully. As I said, he did not get exactly what he paid for, he paid for a rifle. For it to be a rifle it must perform the basic functions of a rifle. If it will not chamber a cartridge then it is not a rifle and the crime is theft. You make it sound like it is this chaps fault, it is not. CZ and the dealer advertised a .505 for a sum of money. They did not supply one for that price. Ergo they stole from him. To fail to supply goods for which you have been paid is not a civil matter it is criminal fraud. Criminal fraud at least here, comes under the theft act. That the price is too cheep for CZ perhaps to deliver a decent 505 is not the fault or the responsibility of the purchaser. |