|
|
|||||||
Quote:Quote: That all seems quite logical. I wonder what the situation is where he is located. We have a similar situation here tho I suspect the ramifications may even be greater generally, with grizzly. They are expanding into our rea, are fully protected and there is no "incidental take" (mistaken) for grizzly, either. Each year attacks occur, a couple people recently were killed, one "next door" in the Natl Park and one down south in AZ. Here the foresters who spend a lot of time alone in the woods are paying attention...the .22 Mag, 9mm and .40 pistols they currently carry are being re-evaluated. I think of it myself as I spend a lot of time alone as well. Each year we read of hunters put up trees by grizzly and attacks. The whole point being to shoot one is to wade into a VERY messy legal situation and while an individual might get away with it, the ability of law enforcement to investigate this sort of thing puts everyone on edge. A situation like what happened w/ the elephant seems to me they had little choice. "Monday Morning Quarterbacking" might indicate they could have run, etc, etc, but I wonder what the authorities would say. Replace that elephant w/ a grizzly, film such a thing here and as insane as it may seem, my money would be on a VERY long and VERY costly legal fight by the shooter (-s) not because it was unjustified, but because the legal situation is just that much of a mess. |