Well sales to Mozambique firearms trade will have some dubious end users and any clear thinking person would know that. CZ and CZ-USA should have a clause in their sales agreement that offers some protection. Yes that would be Nye on useless but would offer the company some protection.

Trying to hide something like this only points to guilt.

Now having said that I do have some reservations. A UN anti gun person is leading/pointing the way/supplying evidence to Govt Agencies. I smell a big rat right there and question the validity of her research.

Last I knew AK47's were the weapon of choice for the poacher. Cheap, readily available as is the ammo. A magazine on auto from under 50mts will devastate a Elephant and Rhino.

The CZ's would be hellishly expensive as would the ammo. So if the poachers had them I doubt they would abandon them easily unless they had used up their ammo and could not afford/acquire more. This may happen if the Asians are supplying the rifles and ammo. If this is the case why are they looking at the manufacturer and not those who bought them from the stores in Moz. Those buyers would lead the investigators back to their bosses. Take them out of the equations and way few Rhinos are going to be poached. Or are the UN and the others high level plays involved in protecting the Rhino's not wanting to upset China?

Maybe I am too cynical.