This is a very interesting dialectic. It's easy to understand the unsporting nature of a "canned" hunt - that's a no brainer for anybody with even minimal scruples. Yet, gatsby makes a legitimate point, in reality this decision turns into a victory for the anit-hunting crowd. I wonder if such consessions were to exist in other parts of the world, if some species would not currently be in danger of becoming extinct, like tigers in India? In reality, all the anti hunting crowd will ultimately do is succeed in driving many majestic species to extinction once they become economically unfeasible.