I can't say I am very impressed with this raffle at all.

The prize value is very inequal with non-US citizens effectively not receiving the rifle prize and also missing out on the airfare value. It is not being marketed purely to US citizens which in that case would be different.

I do not see why the funds saved for both these items could not have been set aside for the winner if a non-US citizen to buy for themselves an air ticket (ie fix a maximum dollar value payable in cash for airfares) and a rifle (ie at the cost to the raffle or sponsor).

This raffle if held in Australia and may other countries would not be legal due to variation in prize value for different participants.