|
|
|||||||
Quote: Phil is a good guy. I think it must be churning out all these continual articles some of these online mags need to sell stuff. "The Best of ...." A lot of net stuff is generating activity. Often the most vigorous is negative arguments. Getting people annoyed at stupid comments, illogical statements, incorrect "facts" etc. "The .45/70 lever action guide gun is the best buffalo rifle" and the multiple a r trolls made arab reloading huge. Outright arguments, swearing, insults. The threads with multiple pages are usually arguments. A good hunt story barely a few replies. Poor show after the poster put in a lot of effort. Arab reloading, all the immature swearing arguments and personal attacks. While good factual discussions, polite interchanges etc meant NE stayed small. But I prefer small to idiot! It gets very annoying on farcebook sometimes ... Ranting again! ![]() Online magazines almost certainly get more traffic if using controversy. But if they start believing their own BS that is a bit sad. Maybe it was advertising. ![]() |