|
|
|||||||
Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote: The old M96/M38 Swedish Mausers, ex-mikitary are fantastically accurate. How much more accuracy is possible? Mine shoots ball FMJ "ex-mill" Target ammo finless than one calibre 3 shot groups. Long 140 gr projectiles. The cartridge handles 160 gr projectiles. Better velocity than the Creedmoor. Original cartridge 127 years old = winner Handles long 6.5 mm projectiles, as it was designed to do = winner. Better velocity than the Creedmoor = winner Better accuracy than wannabe Creedmoor rifles = winner. All in a "$100" rifle, no $8000 specialist rifle needed from the advertising makers = winner winner winner winner winner! The only reason the Creedmoor is popular is excessive promotion. Go back a handfull of years and Americans, most, didn't understand the 6.5 mm at all. As for the PRC cartridge? Don't care. The Creedmoor was on the list. Don't care for the PRC either. Peoples Republic of Congo? I don't care for extreme long range target shooting at game animals either. Unethical, irresponsible. I think the Austrian standards should apply. Two black crosses on one's hunting licence, loose it for life. Shooting targets at long range is cool. I may have to do it soon. Maybe? I'll tell it if it happens. I'll send a PM. Sniping at humans in war at very long range, is also completely different. Cruelty andcwar go together. Btw NitroExpress.com is about vintage rifles, cartridges etc. When the original is still the best, after 127 years, it's the standard for the wannabes to pretend to stand against. |