Quote:

---

270 Vs 6.5. In the target world, the 6.5 would be a clear winner on use alone. Then add in the reasons for this.

In the hunting world it would be the 270 on physics alone. The 270 will penetrate as much as needed and puts a bigger hole, not by much, but a bigger hole in the animal.

The above is all things being as equal as they can.

Same can be said about 280 (7mm) Vs 270 in the hunting world.

---

I don't agree with this..all things being equal, which they are not..the 6.5 has a better BC..so it will retain its speed for longer shots better than the .270..and the sd of the 6.5 when compared to the 270 of equal gr bullet is also better, therefore it will penetrate better..

Agree with you, in the real world and where most shots are taken..300 yards and less, none of this makes much if any difference..

I am merely pointing out the fact, as claimed in an earlier post, that the 270 really does not do anything better than a 6.5, and when given the distance the 6.5 really surpasses the 270 ...


Hornady website

6.5MM .264"
143 gr
ELD-X®
.625 (G1)
.315 (G7)



270 CAL. .277"
145 gr
ELD-X®
.536 (G1)
.270 (G7)

This doesnt includ the ELD-match bullet..which is as follows:

6.5MM .264"
147 gr
ELD® Match
.697 (G1)
.351 (G7)

270 CAL. .277"
N/A..cause the 270 sucks ..

Seriously no match bullets made by Hornady in their latest long range bullet.

Swift Scirocco Bullets--I know they are expensive..BUT....no comparison..

6.5MM .264 130 BTS .266 .571

270 .277 130 BTS .242 .450