Quote:
I've had 2 264's. The first one I had, would blow primers with factory loads, yet a bullet would fall into a case and the case came out at spec., so tight necks weren't the reason. The bullets were not jamming the throat, either. It was the weirdest thing. The bore and groove diameter was also 'right'. I could not figure it out. I had to go to IMR4895 powder due to the capacity reduction necessary to get it to stop producing excessive pressure. I became concerned about the 'reduced loads of 4831 the rifle. was making me use.
The second rifle, a post M70A Winchester shot well, but with it's 22" bl. gave poor speeds at max loadings. I re-barreled it to a .458 Alaskan then sold it when it finished destroying my shoulder cartilage.
The .264 was an interesting round, but I think the 6.5/.284 is a superior round for all round use, as in target or a long range deer/goat/sheep rifle quite capable of taking elk and moose as well.
I have one (264 W mag) in a special run of Rem. years ago--just started shooting it last year..used it on elk--worked really well--shooting Accubonds..around 3150 fps..has a 26" barrel
Also have a Savage F-class in 6.5/284--scoped and ready to go--hv not shot it yet..but its a beast in weight--but would really like to do some long range stuff with it on targets...need a bit more time..
I like the .264 for its great ballistics..and the Win Mag because you are likely to be the only one in camp with one...
Ripp
|